4.02 CMAQ Programming Summary and Obligation Goal
Chair Ferguson provided a summary of the programming summary and obligations.
5.0
Project Changes
5.01 Project Change Request Memo
Jon Haadsma provided an overview of the requested changes.
Approval of the Group Vote
A motion was made by Tom Rickert, seconded by Mark Pitstick, that the project change requests in
items 5.01.1 and 5.01.2 be approved as requested. The motion carried by a voice vote.
5.01.1 Bellwood - Metra Station and Pace Bus Access Improvements (04-24-0005)
PURPOSE & ACTION: The sponsor requests a transfer of $11,685 CMAQ from engineering 2 to
construction and a cost increase of $25,601 CMAQ for construction and construction engineering in
FFY 2026.
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval
5.01.2 Harvard - Access to Transit (11-25-0021)
PURPOSE & ACTION: The sponsor requests a schedule advancement of engineering 2 from FFY 2028
to FFY 2027 and of construction and construction engineering from FFY 2029 to FFY 2028.
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval
6.0
FFY 2028-2032 CMAQ and TAP-L Program Development
6.01 Highway Transportation Impact Criteria - Safety
Alyson Dressman presented recommendations for changes to the safety scoring for the highway
project's Transportation Impact Criteria (TIC) safety score. Highway projects are currently scored for
safety using IDOT's SRI scores. Dressman recommended that safety scoring be replaced with whether
the project is located on a High Injury Network, as defined by each of the County's Safety Action
Plans, and whether the project location has identified systemic risk factors.
Chair Ferguson then presented a proposal to shift 5 points from the Corridor/Transit Improvement
category to the safety category under the Highway Transportation Impact Criteria.
6.02 Direct Emission Reduction Transportation Impact Criteria
In the last call for projects program cycle, the data used to score benefits to sensitive populations was
removed from the EPAs website. As a result, staff were not able to score Direct Emissions Reduction
projects for Transportation Impact Criteria and instead only scored projects using emission benefits
and equity. Chair Ferguson asked committee members if they had ideas for potential alternatives that
could be considered for the upcoming call for projects program cycle.